Also, I like that this simple, yet elegant approach does not need to remove or override the explicit -path or -lib flags at all. I'm not sure why we didn't think of it when I wrote the initial PR a year ago.On Sep 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:Yeah. I find "you need to tell PD where to look" make sense, but adding "and HOW it needs to look" becomes the issue.On Sep 11, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Julian Brooks <jbeezez@gmail.com> wrote:+1You only understand how non-intuitive current [declare] is once you've attempted to describe it simply to a roomful of learners.Not saying current situation isn't a huge improvement over where we were umpteen years ago but if there's the option to make it even simpler & more straightforward plus portable - yes please.J.On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 11:42, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:Actually, that's not a bad idea at the expense of a little more searching. [declare] then behaves more like the lua loader which searches for both binary and script modules, which I find relatively easy to use. I don't think this would break existing patches and would also honor the relative path restrictions for self contained projects, where specifying a relative path starting with ./ or ../ only searches locally.On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:42:00 +0200
From: Antoine Rousseau <antoine@metalu.net>
To: pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] declare (again)
Message-ID:
<CAOCG5Hx19cSDb5GkJ2onAtY8OU_XaQOZs28qXGn=8JZSi1ELKw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
relatively easy code change
... so I propose step 2 as PR #440 !
cheers