Hi Ben
Thanks for your thoughts and tips! Pt is a nice library for Gem use, but I will check out the use of pool and the abstration communication.
It'll great see new objects/interfaces developed in perhaps in the long term-perhaps using Pt as a way of interfacing with an arduino board to create physical/digital video tools.
Cheers! (+happy holidays!)
Alan
Hi Alan,
I have not touched pT in years. Its in SVN and you have my blessing if
you want to take it over.
The main issues are its dependence on pool, which is not in PD-extended.
Also the method used for pT abstractions to communicate is awkward and
could/should be replaced with something else.
I don't see myself getting back into it, so I'd be happy for someone to
breath some new life into it.
Ben
On 10-12-14 11:27 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Hey Alan,
>
> pixeltango is GPLv2 so the license is easy. Ben Bogart was the main
> author, as far as I know. Its an interesting idea, highlevel patching
> for video apps. It could use some testing and bugfixes, but I think its
> usable.
>
> .hc
>
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 16:42 +0000, ALAN BROOKER wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I'm looking into maintaining the Pixel Tango library for PD extended
>> which is currently listed as not having a maintainer, is there
>> any licence issue I should be aware of, (e.g if I would be authorised
>> to do so if I am not the author?) I'm not aware of any myself
>>
>>
>> Any comments on this library would be appreciated too
>>
>>
>> Thanks all
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev@iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev@iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev