That sounds reasonable to me!

Happy to transfer it.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 5:06 AM Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:
+1

If people use it, it will be maintained. It's best if someone can act as a general maintainer to help coordinate submissions from the general community. The pd-externals group makes it relatively easy for this unless you want to keep the project within your user space specifically. If transferred, you can still be the owner of the repository with full access to it.

On Mar 20, 2024, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:09:27 +0100
From: IOhannes m zm?lnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>
To: pd-dev@lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Seeking co-maintainers for Scheme for Pd
Message-ID: <29d3083f-0419-4c7a-a1b6-fbdb29169bc4@iem.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

On 3/17/24 06:14, Iain Duncan wrote:
It occurred to me thinking further that really one doesn't need to know
much about Scheme or Lisp, provided one is interested, as I didn't when I
started! The work is mostly in C. FWIW. :-)

how about moving the repository to <https://github.com/pd-externals/> ?
there are always? some volunteers who can help with bugfixing and the 
like, and if someone is willing to dig deeper into scheme4pd, they can 
always join (and leave, if need be).

in general i think the pd-externals group is a good place for small 
team-maintained externals.


personally, i am interested in that external (and have plenty of C 
skills) - but honestly I have other things on my plate as well, so 
couldn't do a full time maintenance o fthe project.

gfmards
IOhannes