Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
How does minimizing the number of "loaded libraries" affect the goal of storing preferences in patches?
depends on what you mean by "storing the preferences in patches". one part of the preferences is the libraries to be loaded. personally, i think it is a good thing to explicitely require libraries in patches that need them.
Yeah, but IMO one has nothing to do with the other. Just because a pd-extended user would be forced to manage preferences manually doesn't make [import] a builtin or makes everyone layout their patches and externals as Pd-extended does it neither lets it [declare] work in abstractions. So I don't see how a minimized set of libraries affects anything.
Personally I don't care what pd-extended loads and what not, but *if* minimizing libraries should be done, then I think no library should be loaded at all besides [import].
Ciao