I think that, with "soundfiler" there's no problem (you just have to specify a bigger maximum in a Pd message).
cheers Miller
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:24:35PM +0000, David Plans Casal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2006, at 18:29, Miller Puckette wrote:
On some OSes (I needn't name names:) the system can hang if one asks to malloc too much space. This was a major cause of headaches for people trying to use Pd to read large soundfiles. Anyway, as you already found, this doesn't affect the "soundfiler" object which has a settable maximum.
Thank you for that clarification. I understand the original limitation now.
However, I am wondering whether it wouldn't be better to pre-empt large soundfile loading, as opposed to making people who need to use large soundfile arrays use custom compilation?
Just a thought, I realise there's history at play here.
d
-- David Plans Casal Researcher, UEA Studios d.casal at uea dot ac dot uk http://www.davidcasal.com
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev