On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi, guenter geiger schrieb:
I am not sure if we should release all together, or separate. If we release the flext externals we have to compile them for MAX too ?
No, why should we? They compile just like any other external. You give them the target platform with a -Define. MAX-versions are impossible on Linux and Windows (currently) anyway.
You are right, stupid question. Ok, so what we will have to do (I know we talked about this when doing the debian packages, but this release should be general for GNU/Linux.
- pd-externals (all externals that do not depend on additional libraries except libc and libm)
compiled for: * Linux * OSX * Windows
- flext - flext-externals compiled for: * Linux gcc2 * Linux gcc3 (Do we need both versions ??) * OSX * Windows
Then there are some externals left that depend on libraries (like the ogg things). Should we compile them statically ?
What else ?
Ah, yes, ask everyone if it is ok to release the code as it is now.
Document installation (or add installer scripts ?) Should we release .rpm and .debs directly ?
Well, and above all fix the Windows compilation. I might be able to do that on Monday.
Greetings,
Guenter