On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:50:00AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
- IEM? (is this an option?)
pros: cons: lots of work for IOhannes.
- savanna.nongnu.org
pros: cons:
- Rent a dedicated server.
pros: we have total control. cons: we have to install and set up. costs money.
i do not fully understand the difference between 1. and 3. we could rent a dedicated server at the IEM :-)
We can? Ok. If we rent, we would need to evaluate the different options for price, features, etc.
I was under the impression that the IEM option was IEM donating server resources with yourself doing the administration.
as for savanna: how is this different from just staying at sourceforge?
We know the SF sucks. Do we have evidence that Savanna sucks?
Let's add an option:
4. Stay at sourceforge but transition to SVN. pros: easy. cons: SF sucks.
Best,
Chris.
------------------- http://mccormick.cx