Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 17:45:41 +0200
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] call for discussion double-precision file
extension
I lean much more on the side that PDINSTANCE is a low-level, per project compile option and not general-purpose. If you are using libpd, then your environment is a bit more custom anyway.
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:06:23 +0200
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] call for discussion double-precision file
> extension
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
>
> On 3/29/22 20:26, Sebastian Shader via Pd-dev wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if anything should be considered for multi-instance support as well (externals compiled w/ PDINSTANCE)
>
> good question.
>
> afaict, there are no plans to ever ship binaries Pd with PDINSTANCE=1
> (but i have no idea, really).
>
> can we expect developers of PDINSTANCE-enabled (lib)Pds to also provide
> the binaries for the extrenals?
> i guess it would be nice if you (as a patch-developer with a
> compiler-allergy) could just install whatever externals you want to be
> included with your camomille-based VST plugin.
>
> gfmdras
> IOhannes
--------
Dan Wilcox
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
------------------------------
End of Pd-dev Digest, Vol 202, Issue 13
***************************************