-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/20/2010 12:37 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
While I can't really comment on the implementation since i haven't reviewed it in depth, I can say that I am a fan of having the interface be a series of *bang objects over having a [loadbang] with arguments. I think its nice, simple, and clear. Then we also can have things like [propertybang] for implementing Properties panels in abstractions.
ahm, what is wrong with the [propertybang] as found in iemguts? and how would the inclusion of [initbang] be related to this?
or is it just a general comment on why you (and me :-)) prefer a number of *bang objects over e.g. [loadbang close]
as for the implementation: i don't care if it was implemented differently. iirc, i tried to follow the implementation style as closely as that of the rest of Pd ;-)
Also, I've used [initbang] some in Pd-extended and so far it works well. [closebang] is tricky because the patch is being deleted when its triggered.
well yes, that's the idea of [closebang], no? i don't really understand what is tricky about it.
mfdsdfg IOhannes