For some reason your response didn't show up in my email Cristof, but to answer your question, I am providing two creation arguments that sets the number of inlets and outlets. Could you elaborate on how buffer aliasing is caused by how the surrounding objects are connected? Assuming of course that's the problem here, but my suspicion is rather that I'm not reading from all inlets before writing to the outlets.


On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:14 PM <pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at> wrote:
Send Pd-dev mailing list submissions to
        pd-dev@lists.iem.at

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at

You can reach the person managing the list at
        pd-dev-owner@lists.iem.at

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pd-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. inlets sending to wrong outlets (Eric Lennartson)
   2. Re: inlets sending to wrong outlets (Alexandre Torres Porres)
   3. Re: inlets sending to wrong outlets (Eric Lennartson)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:54 -0700
From: Eric Lennartson <lennartsoneric@gmail.com>
To: pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
Subject: [PD-dev] inlets sending to wrong outlets
Message-ID:
        <CAGkKnE1H0Cnto7iFVLs=YKm+h0Vj0ruVBxFwcDY7z+kZJaejxg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hey all,

I've been working with variable amounts of inlets and outlets and for the
most part it's been working fine. If it's only variable inlets and the
outlets are fixed, or vice versa, it works fine. However when both are
variable I can't seem to get the inlets to go to the correct outlet. My
current code is cycling through the inlets and outlets in pairs, but for
some reason this isn't working. Any thoughts?

Thanks
Eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20200531/18776bbd/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:05:30 -0300
From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>
To: Eric Lennartson <lennartsoneric@gmail.com>
Cc: pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] inlets sending to wrong outlets
Message-ID:
        <CAEAsFmgbRt2ihcCM2SvmL8H4gHx-BWEo9rL1zNmOzijbYHV+Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I remember I went through similar stuff, see the code of else/mtx~ and
cyclone/matrix~

and, share your code?

cheers

Em dom., 31 de mai. de 2020 às 16:00, Eric Lennartson <
lennartsoneric@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hey all,
>
> I've been working with variable amounts of inlets and outlets and for the
> most part it's been working fine. If it's only variable inlets and the
> outlets are fixed, or vice versa, it works fine. However when both are
> variable I can't seem to get the inlets to go to the correct outlet. My
> current code is cycling through the inlets and outlets in pairs, but for
> some reason this isn't working. Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20200531/b94e1564/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 12:12:52 -0700
From: Eric Lennartson <lennartsoneric@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>, pd-dev
        <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] inlets sending to wrong outlets
Message-ID:
        <CAGkKnE1X6RmTfc_gFagN5TkrUstQAh_xFP7q89WV1c+7i6zE2w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I've been looking at the code for those, but I'm finding it a little hard
to parse.
Not sure how this is going to look on your end, but sorry for the text
wall. If there's a better way to share lmk.

typedef struct _viotest

{

    t_object x_obj;



    int n_outs, n_ins, n_iolets;

    t_sample **in_vec, **out_vec; // vector to hold all the inlets and
outlets

} t_viotest_tilde;


static void viotest_tilde_input(t_viotest_tilde *x, t_floatarg f)

{

      error("[viotest~]: no method for float.");

}


static t_int *viotest_tilde_perform(t_int *w)

{

    t_viotest_tilde *x = (t_viotest_tilde *)(w[1]);

    int nblock = (int)(w[2]);

    int n = nblock;



    t_sample **in_vec = x->in_vec;

    t_sample **out_vec = x->out_vec;



    int smaller = (x->n_ins < x-> n_outs) ? x->n_ins : x->n_outs;

    for(int channel = 0; channel < smaller; ++channel)

    {

        t_sample* in = in_vec[channel];

        t_sample* out = out_vec[channel];

        n = nblock;

        while(n--)

        {

            t_sample out_val = *in++;

            *out++ = out_val;

        }

    }


    return (w + 3);

}


static void viotest_tilde_dsp(t_viotest_tilde *x, t_signal **sp)

{

    int i, nblock = sp[0]->s_n;



    t_sample **dummy = x->in_vec;



    for(i = 0; i < x->n_ins; ++i)

    {

        *dummy++ = sp[i]->s_vec;

    }



    for(; i < x->n_iolets; ++i)

    {

        *dummy++ = sp[i]->s_vec;

    }



    dsp_add(viotest_tilde_perform, 2, x, nblock);

}

On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:05 PM Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I remember I went through similar stuff, see the code of else/mtx~ and
> cyclone/matrix~
>
> and, share your code?
>
> cheers
>
> Em dom., 31 de mai. de 2020 às 16:00, Eric Lennartson <
> lennartsoneric@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I've been working with variable amounts of inlets and outlets and for the
>> most part it's been working fine. If it's only variable inlets and the
>> outlets are fixed, or vice versa, it works fine. However when both are
>> variable I can't seem to get the inlets to go to the correct outlet. My
>> current code is cycling through the inlets and outlets in pairs, but for
>> some reason this isn't working. Any thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Eric
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20200531/464e356e/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


------------------------------

End of Pd-dev Digest, Vol 181, Issue 24
***************************************