On Jun 15, 2022, at 1:32 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:32:09 +0200
From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com>
To: pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Compiling fat external binaries for Mac OS X
Message-ID: <ce868065d84420fd1d5115a34b0f433ba0a82d70.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 12:53 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:On Jun 15, 2022, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:23:16 +0200
From:?reduzent@gmail.com
To:?pd-dev@lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Compiling fat external binaries for Mac OS X
Message-ID:
<3646dbc2fcbfdf0a16d8feb20aa7bb11a6f5db58.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 20:04 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:You can simply pass in the arches you want using the "arch"
makefile
variable:
make arch="x86_64 arm64"
That's cool to know. In the case of purest_json, I believe it ships
with other dependencies (libjson?) and if those come from homebrew,
they're probably not fat. Is my assumption correct, that a fat
binary
would have to link to fat binary??
I don't believe so. I think (not 100%) the system lib loading
mechanism just needs to find the lib *and* have the right arch. I
don't believe it matters if the lib is fat or not.
Thanks for the clarification. The interesting question (to me at least)
is: If I want to support both archs, does the linked library need to be
fat, or can I link to two separate files per dependency? If I can't
link to different files for different archs, this means there is no
other way for maintaining support of both archs than to link to a fat
library.
Roman