On 10/19/2012 08:21 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That's good to have, please post and maintain that somewhere, like maybe in the 'osc' lib. But its not yet a replacement because at the very least its not deployed.
i honestly dunno what you mean here.
imho, if you want to make changes to the OSCx library, you should rather replace the externals with the patches i sent than replacing the autoconf stuff with template/Makefile and renaming the folder (obviously, once that is done there is exactly no reason to keep autoconf stuff so template/Makefile (or even a stripped down version if you think it too bloaded) is enough. this would "deploy" those objects to all PdX-0.43 installations (if this is what you mean by "deploy"). i figure, that the replacement patches have less bugs than the external versions.
starting yet another library doesn't make sense to me (esp. since the 2 objects are almost 100% compatible (the only thing missing is multicast-group support, and i wonder whether anybody uses that).
adding those patches to mrpeach/osc (if this is what you refer to as "the 'osc' lib) is imo not a splendid idea either, as mrpeach/osc is blissfully unaware of the transport layer. (if martin thinks differently, he should go and add those patches)
fgmsdra IOhannes