Em ter., 8 de jul. de 2025 às 05:11, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> escreveu:
I think most of what's in the color fix PR should be considered, except maybe the # stuff for now.

Yeah, I guess this is the "biggest" one and more controversial, and it's tied to the iemguis issue. It should require a better discussion. I edited the first comment/description and improved the clarity a bit. I think they're all no-brainers and easy to incorporate. But dealing with the iemguis is still not ready and tricky. If you all want symbol, I can also try to let iemguis take color names like "black", "magenta" and "mistyrose".

Now, even though this takes care of most issues, there are still a couple more I wanted to add. At least one seems quite important, and it was brought up by you Dan, the ability to also set the blinking text edit marker. But that might be out of my scope... I'd also like to see Pd's console window take Pd's colors, but that seems even more tricky to me.

cheers
 
Introducing colors will be great and remove a sore spot for many and the things addressed in the PR really refine these changes IMO:


enohp ym morf tnes
-----------
Dan Wilcox


On Jul 8, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at> wrote:

There is too much stuff in there for me to check it carefully... I'd have to put out a new test release and wait a few more weeks.  What are the urgently needed fixes?  (patch cords of course.)

There are plenty of other color _features_ we should have but I want to just deal with the things that are truly needed :)

cheers
M


On 7/7/25 11:05 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
objection your honor

This PR fixes some of the color issues, which is currently broken/bugged/incomplete

https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2646 <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2646__;!!Mih3wA!HxTHd-n3hgDyCGWXqQShosJycpFAOBf7bnXVEiRShXjVB2uvtAdqTQ5mJGHjWl85YsZpp-6RqQ$>

There are still more things to take care of on this side, so can you check and merge it and just have a test2 before we nail it?

thanks

Em seg., 7 de jul. de 2025 às 18:02, Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27@hotmail.com> escreveu:

   not any objections from my side. but can we include
   https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2631
   <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2631__;!!Mih3wA!HxTHd-n3hgDyCGWXqQShosJycpFAOBf7bnXVEiRShXjVB2uvtAdqTQ5mJGHjWl85YsZmHFMIIw$>
   so its easier for us to
   test  > 0.56 development on Windows?


   --     Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas

   On 07/07/2025 17:31, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
   > I think 0.56 is ready to go... any objections?
   >
   > cheers
   > M
   >
   > ---
   > pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
   >
   https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/WKH7Q7LLSB3CEIG2YT552WSVRPKIC3OY/
   <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/WKH7Q7LLSB3CEIG2YT552WSVRPKIC3OY/__;!!Mih3wA!HxTHd-n3hgDyCGWXqQShosJycpFAOBf7bnXVEiRShXjVB2uvtAdqTQ5mJGHjWl85YsaAVVB2_w$>

   >
   >

    ---
   pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
   https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/GVC6EVQ55JBY3PMRBBMCXSNPZJGBGEJY/
   <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/GVC6EVQ55JBY3PMRBBMCXSNPZJGBGEJY/__;!!Mih3wA!HxTHd-n3hgDyCGWXqQShosJycpFAOBf7bnXVEiRShXjVB2uvtAdqTQ5mJGHjWl85YsbXkcyKag$>


 ---
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/3DJDUXOMNOAMBGQ74PHRNOFNFHGEQZ4U/__;!!Mih3wA!HxTHd-n3hgDyCGWXqQShosJycpFAOBf7bnXVEiRShXjVB2uvtAdqTQ5mJGHjWl85YsZZkw6Kvw$


---
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/UDS3Y5JXEOYU4UMFQ7Z5LUXUSZSIZ5R2/
 ---
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/MP4QCJ4BPI5C3BWQAQUN4RKWPYL333JA/