No thats fine, I've attached both c files. (they are a bit messy at the moment due to debugging and tearing them apart sorry, if you need cleaner commented code I can comment it up no problem)
will that mean that the list would be out of sync with the frames/blocks? because the list being outputted is a specific list of filter coefficients unique to each particular frame and is needed by the next object for it to function correctly. (sorry I don't know much about the clock_delay function)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:27 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-04-27 12:08, Andrew Hassall wrote:
Anyone have any ideas why the pointer would change so dramatically? Is it being corrupted? if so any ideas what by?
do you mind sharing the complete code?
and an unrelated issue with your code: you shouldn't call outlet_list() from within your perform routine; rather, it should be scheduled in the next tick (using clock_delay(0))...of course this will delay the analysis by one block
fgmar IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk23764ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQAzQCfZNq2N06FQ3GPAWA89cdUE7W0 Ac4An0xrX0Kt7c6dRAqVzIdFLB657b9G =/Ocz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev