This is something that I could potential do at work and tackling that list could probably be part of it. I was thinking of making a generic interface so that file types could be split into separate .c files like the audio & midi backends. This would make adding a new format much easier and improve maintenance as well.
This is something that probably would happen more in late summer-fall time, although I could imagine doing smaller aspects of it beforehand for 0.50. I could justify using this time for the overall project, to some degree. :)
On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Miller Puckette <
msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:
I'm of two minds about this - I think it would be excellent to start offering64-bit file lengths, but I wonder if this is going to be a widely-used formator not (personally I've never heard of it :)Also - I have three dolist items for soundfiler/read/writesf~ :fix thread-unsafe way readsf~ searches along the file path (need to make alocal copy of the path so that the sub-thread isn't asking the canvas todo the search via open_via_path)allow reading and writing ASCII text files (way way overdue!)fix writesf~ to make running updates to the chunk size as the file grows,so that if the file never gets 'closed' it still gets a reasonable sizeNone of this is the least bit fun or interesting I'm afraid...cheersMillerOn Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:36:21PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:Em qui, 18 de abr de 2019 ??s 14:22, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com>
escreveu:
???Why not???? would come from other maintainers who do not necessarily want
to be stuck with yet more code. I???m pretty sure I can structure this in a
way to fit in with the object already works, but I???d rather not try if
there is no interest in recovering the code.
Sure, I see. I hope then you can get it working in a way that doesn't raise
any concern to Miller. I'll stress again that it can be useful at least for
the loop and sound effects library from *Soundtrack Pro* and *Logic Studio*
.
it may not be too difficult to dump the extra info but that???s a separate
issue.
yeah, I had opened this one
<https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/586>
cheers
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev