On Apr 2, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:

I notice that the "warning-fixes" pull request is marked 'closed' - is it
still what I should be looking at?

thanks
M

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 02:47:19AM -0600, Dan Wilcox wrote:

Also, let me know if I should submit patches like this to the patch tracker. I figured I’d ask for feedback and take a couple stabs at it first here & on GitHub before adding any more noise to SF.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:36 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:

Since no one is biting, I managed to fix most of the warnings by defining HAVE_ALLOCA_H and -Wno-parentheses in the Makefile.

Here’s a patch with the residuals:

* add default: break; for unhandled case statements
* change stddef.h include to stdlib.h for alloca() on BSD as per Tobias request

<warning_fixes3.patch>

Howdy all,

I put the proposed changes in the previous patches into a couple WIP branches on GH.

https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11> <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11>>

https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12> <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12>>

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>