On Dec 1, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
Good idea... but unfortunately it generalizes to any object that has an 'anything' method plus other specific ones, so if I started doing this I wouldn't know where to stop!
Sounds good to me. :) I prefer inlets over custom message selectors when possible. I think they are cleaner and easier to use.
BTW, the help window doesn't make it clear, but the main reason for having stdout is for use with pd~.
Ah, that makes sense. On that note, a [pdwindow] or [console] object for getting the data from the Pd window would be quite handy.
.hc
cheers Miller
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 08:11:02PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey,
I just checked out [stdout] in pd 0.42 in extra, looks like a handy object. One comment, what about adding a second inlet that you can bang for the flush? This would be instead of the "flush" message. Then the first inlet can always just be passed straight through to stdout.
.hc
The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra