Of course, I'm not a developer, but I think that this is a smart way to go.  Especially interchangeability of GUI components.  Who knows when a nice, new version of a given object may be forged by a rogue programmer to be easily dropped into place...
 
~Kyle

 
On 12/14/06, Thomas Grill <gr@grrrr.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language, I propose moving
>> the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into the "extra" folder,
>> compiled as individual files. The only changes needed to make this
>> happen is to rename and move the relevant g_*.c files to extra,
>> renaming the setup() functions accordingly, and changing the
>> makefile.  All of these are pretty trivial.
>>
>> Thoughts, comments, objections, improvements?
>>

I'm all for it, in my opinion all gui elements should be optional and/
or exchangeable.

greetings,
Thomas


_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev



--

http://theradioproject.com
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO