Hi Jonathan -
I don't feel confortable with the design but don't understand the rationale for them well enough to know how to evaluate them. (And I think initbang and closebang are totally different animals...)
I want to redesign loadbang to take arguments, one of which could indicate at what "phase" of loading or closing the message should come out -- but this is a bigger design problem than I'm able to attack right now. I worry, though, that enshrining the proposed initbang/closebang will make thiings uglier and more complicated than necessary.
cheers Miller
Miller- would you mind commenting on the initbang/closebang patch on Sourceforge, as to why it's still not included in your Pd?
Thanks, Jonathan
I'm curious what features you have in mind, and looking forward to having you in NYC. Perhaps we should have a mini PdCon here in the Fall :)
.hc
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 17:06 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Hi all,
I have only 2 weeks left in the vicinity of my usual
collection of testing
machines (will be in New York Sept 1 - Jan. 1!) and so
should probably
try to get 0.43 finalized. I have several bugs
to work on but I think the
whole thing is ready to put out compiled "test
versions" for people to
exercise.
I'll try not to add new "features" but just fix bugs
for the next 2 weeks --
I'll have all fall for the next bunch of features
(including, perhaps, the
ones I've been trying to find time to work on).
I'll do my usual compiling and spot testing, hopefully
putting out the
test versions within the next day.
cheers Miller
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at