Em qua., 23 de fev. de 2022 às 06:21, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> escreveu:

that is just a bug in your code.
it should read:

```
int nblock = sp[0]->s_n;
```

If I do that I get this similar warning

warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning

      to 't_int *' (aka 'long *') from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]

        sigvec[n_sig - 1] = nblock; // block size (n)

 

 this happens here => https://github.com/porres/pd-else/blob/master/Classes/Source/chance~.c#L79

'sigvec' is declared as t_int ** and is used in dsp_addv(chance_perform, n_sig, (t_int *)sigvec); 

I tried everything and was able to remove the warning by matching things up at one point, I don't remember exactly what I did, but the problem is that the object would blow up Pd when DSP was on, so no good... So yeah, the solution to remove this warning doesn't seem to be trivial and is way over my head. 

I'd really like to have no warnings at all as I believe this is some proof the code is robust, but that's just an assumption from someone who's not a real programmer.

This object has a variable number of signal outlets and I don't remember where I copied this structure from (maybe some object in Cyclone?). Perhaps I have to adopt a whole new strategy so if someone can point me to some other code out there as a reference I'd appreciate it.

thanks