Pd-dev December 2012

pd-dev@lists.iem.at

14 participants
173 discussions

[ pure-data-Patches-3578746 ] [bugfix]: non-2^n-BS bug
by SourceForge.net 03 Dec '12

03 Dec '12

Patches item #3578746, was opened at 2012-10-20 10:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3578746&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: [bugfix]: non-2^n-BS bug Initial Comment: I'm really not a 'spammer'! ...nor a hypochondriac... I've tested several versions of pd (0.42.5 - 0.43.3 (ext/van)). None of them is working with non-2^n-BSes! On the mailing-list ( http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-dev@iem.at/msg11344.html ), Claude Heiland-Allen states that it is already implemented.. (Thanks Claude) But I can't confirm that. I've tried the patch he posted there, - without success: The blocksize is always rounded to the next bigger power of 2, it seems! I don't know what he's on, but I'm on windows. Maybe that makes the difference.. (Is this a hardware- or Os-dependent feature..??) Please take a look at the attached pd-patch. It's my attempt to work out the problem.. If someone could give me a resonable answer, I promise I'll never come back again ;) ...for this issue... PS: It feels a little annoying if one does not get a real response or not a response at all! (Eg. look at the feature requests. The last one on the 1st page is like 2 years old, so you can't say there are too many to respond to each one..). This especially is true if the response is longer than the acual answer like "Yes", "No" or "I don't know". That would have been a big help for me already. Although it's not making the bug disappear automatically... Anything like if it is a useful/good idea is something I'd like to know, when posting something, for exapmle.. But no, I won't be scared away so easily.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2012-12-02 15:15 Message: Hey very cool website!! Man .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I am going to bookmark your site and take the feeds alsoIm happy to find numerous useful information with the post, we��d like develop more associated with this regard, appreciate your sharing. . . . . . <a href="http://colorfield5.blogoak.com?blogname=colorfield5&postarch=4" title="Retailer">Retailer</a> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2012-11-15 01:59 Message: I'm curious to find out what blog platform you're utilizing? I'm experiencing some small security problems with my latest blog and I would like to find something more risk-free. Do you have any suggestions? north face jackets clearance http://nyarofvfcp.tumblr.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-10-30 00:50 Message: feel free to report oddities as bugs - and please report each oddity as a separate bug (in the bug-tracker rather than follow-ups on this ticket) als make sure you report issues and don't ask questions like "how does this work?" :-) (and if you want to discuss the tracker/forum/mailinglist/IRC thing, please join the mailinglist and/or the IRC...!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2012-10-29 23:13 Message: ...oh now it's here... Just in case you're working on BS-things anyways I only wanted to mention that I have some more BS-related oddities. If you are interested, I can do a search and gather them. If you are talking about the hurleur-forum, I always thought that was not the right place for the devs?!? ..I haven't been there for a while ...since I have no problems with the installation... ;) I never wanted it to be only a question.. and it finally turned out to be a real bug. ..after the third try to convince you... ...I do what I can to help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-10-25 07:43 Message: @op: if you don't feel comfortable with the mailinglists, why not use another support-channel (IRC, forum?) the sf-trackers are here to track bugs and issues, not questions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-10-25 07:38 Message: indeed i can confirm the bug (as discussed on the mailinglist). i'll attach a (simplistic?) fix that appears to make it work with current git (and this time i tried hard to avoid introducing trailing whitespaces) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2012-10-24 06:38 Message: I didn't know about that. I find the lists to be a little confusing.. There are so many, with all the archives. And sometimes some posts (from sf) only occur at the archive if I'm not mistaken..??? But I'll take a closer look... Anyways, did you (or someone else) take a look at the file?? Oh and just let me take this chance to thank you very very much for this brilliant piece of software. This is far more than programming. If it wasn't that good, it wouldn't have take me that much time... ..I mean I wouldn't have spent it... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Date: 2012-10-20 21:38 Message: Sorry - SF is a pain for me - can you follow up on the mailing list? That way more people will be able to find the long thread that will doubtless ensue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3578746&group_…

1 0

[ pure-data-Patches-3591846 ] portaudio fixes
by SourceForge.net 02 Dec '12

02 Dec '12

Patches item #3591846, was opened at 2012-12-02 08:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3591846&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Private: No Submitted By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: portaudio fixes Initial Comment: this patches fixes the current portaudio implementation. since it is too big to be added to the patch-tracker (i imported portaudio-20121129), you can download it from http://iem.at/~zmoelnig/0001-updated-to-portaudio-20121129-snapshot.patch.b… ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-12-02 09:07 Message: raising priority, since the current state of affairs breaks all builds from current git. what i did: - after the import of the portaudio-20121101 snapshot, some files where missing to smoothly integrate with Pd's autotools system. - so I re-imported portaudio with the missing files (and used the 20121126 snapshot, since that was the one i found on the portaudio website) - I tried to keep the import to a minimum (but imported all files an ordinary make would want to run a compilation) - i added the new portaudio build-system to pd/configure.ac (so pa's configure will get called automatically by Pd's configure) - i also adjusted the link-path of libportaudio in pd/src/Makefile.am to it's new location ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3591846&group_…

1 0

[ pure-data-Patches-3591846 ] portaudio fixes
by SourceForge.net 02 Dec '12

02 Dec '12

Patches item #3591846, was opened at 2012-12-02 08:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3591846&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Private: No Submitted By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: portaudio fixes Initial Comment: this patches fixes the current portaudio implementation. since it is too big to be added to the patch-tracker (i imported portaudio-20121129), you can download it from http://iem.at/~zmoelnig/0001-updated-to-portaudio-20121129-snapshot.patch.b… ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3591846&group_…

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pd-dev December 2012