hi,

here are some binaries : https://github.com/avilleret/Gem/releases I've build everything I can. I've also put as many third party dll i've, not sure if it's a good idea, but well it is just for testing, waiting for reply to this question. You'll found some Gem's plugins in some subfolders. Please also note, that gem_videoVLC is crashing and not all plugins can be loaded successfully.

+ a

-- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr

2014-09-19 22:41 GMT+02:00 Antoine Villeret antoine.villeret@gmail.com:

thanks for the feedback,

concerning the plugins, they are waiting for me in Brussel, I'm on tour in France I'll be back shortly next week, maybe I'll manage some spare time (between 2 washing machines) to put them onand line :-)

and concerning the tag, i've edited it and called it v0.94-test2 it's marked as a pre-release in Github's release page, but the tag didn't reflect it

should I choose another name to reflect the windows specific pre-release ?

and concerning the missing DLL, could I add them to the (pre)-release .zip ? does the license allow me to do that ? and what about static link ? particularly for ImageMagick which depends on 285 DLL... is it a good idea ? even if the binary size is hugely increased ?

a

-- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr

2014-09-19 21:11 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at:

...

On 09/12/2014 01:56 PM, Antoine Villeret wrote:

...

For now, I've put the Gem.dll on [2]. Feel free to try it !

...

...

[2] : https://github.com/avilleret/Gem/releases/tag/0.94-win32

thanks a lot. i had no problems with the dll (that is: no runtime msvcrt.dll was missing). i only miss the plugins :-)

oh, and would you mind tagging the release as a test-release (instead of 0.94-win32, which sounds like everything's already working). i'm a bit worried about accidentally pushing (to my repos) the tags i pulled from your fork.

gfadsr IOhannes

---

GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev