what's the difference between pix_filmQT and pix_filmDarwin on OSX? it seems like pix_filmQT cannot open movie-files (here), wherease pix_filmDarwin works just fine.
can therefore pix_filmQT be removed entirely? (on w32, pix_film+filmQT is used successfully anyhow; i think pix_filmQT originally came from the w32 implementation)
mfg.adsfr IOhannes
pix_filmDarwin is the one to use.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:42 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.atwrote:
what's the difference between pix_filmQT and pix_filmDarwin on OSX? it seems like pix_filmQT cannot open movie-files (here), wherease pix_filmDarwin works just fine.
can therefore pix_filmQT be removed entirely? (on w32, pix_film+filmQT is used successfully anyhow; i think pix_filmQT originally came from the w32 implementation)
mfg.adsfr IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
Hi,
Although the message 'colorspace Grey' works fine for me in PD- extended (version 0.40.3) on Ubuntu Hardy 32 bits, it doesn't work on os X (10.5.6 intel) for me.
I tried pix_film, pix_filmQT, pix_filmDarwin an I got the same thing, even if I load again the same or a new video (something suggested in a message in the Pd window). My videos are RGBA.
loic
-
chris clepper -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Loic Kessous