hello,
i'd like to test this. but i have no idea of the message to send to pix_video. culd you send a short overview of the message to send so that i can update the help file?
thx Cyrille
Le 22/12/2010 22:20, SourceForge.net a écrit :
Feature Requests item #3027360, was opened at 2010-07-09 12:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507082&aid=3027360...
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Cyrille Henry (nusmuk) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: add control to uvc devices on linux
Initial Comment: most webcam are using uvc driver on linux. this drivers allow control over diferents parametters of the camera (lighting / gamma / etc). it would be nice to be able to control this parametters from a Gem patch. by example, to be able to remove auto luminausity is very important for tracking...
Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2010-12-22 21:20
Message: This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker).
Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2010-12-08 20:40
Message: a running prototype can be found in the current trunk
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2010-07-11 15:38
Message: here is a screenshot of how GridFlow's camera settings used to look like : http://gridflow.ca/gallery/%23camera-2009.png
black-on-grey is for read-only things ; grey-on-grey is for disabled things ; blue is for enabled things.
the dialogue is still pretty much the same, but some settings have been added, some have been removed, and the camera selector is much different now.
Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2010-07-09 15:46
Message: i totally agree. the problem is mainly to stay consistently across the increasing number of backends for Gem's video-capture (e.g. how to make sure that all backends use the same names for features; what about features that don't exist on a certain platform?)
i'm currently thinking of a way to query the available parameters for the current device and make this available within the patch), so you could write a patch that generates the "dialog" to control what's controllable
You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507082&aid=3027360...
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev