Le 22/11/2016 à 14:39, Jack a écrit :
Hello,
Le 22/11/2016 à 12:47, cyrille henry a écrit :
hello,
maybe we can try starting on the mailing list, and if a specific question need to be discuss, we can join on IRC.
So, the questions i've got are :
- is a mandatory feature is missing?
- is help files up to date with all new functionalities?
- what need to be done to compile on osX?
- what need to be done to compile on windows?
Is there enough abstractions using shaders for simple effects like contrast, brightness, hue, saturation, etc. that can replace pix_* objects.
Nowdays, there are lot's of online resource about shaders. I think Gem provide the minimum to understand how to work with shaders in Gem.
I have no plan to create more shader example, unless i've missed an important feature. But is someone else want to create more example, he is welcome.
Is there enough examples/99.games (or something else) as "case study" ?
there will never be enough! ;-) but again, adding more should slow down a release cycle.
cheers c
++
Jack
- is there anything else?
cheers c
Le 22/11/2016 à 09:44, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2016-11-21 13:21, Nicolas Montgermont via GEM-dev wrote:
Hello,
Did you had the opportunity to discuss this topic in pdcon?
unfortunately we did not. (it was scheduled for sunday morning; but then program ran a bit late on sunday (due to excessive drink consumption) and i had to catch my plane.
so we just need to do that,
- either on this mailing list
OR
- on IRC
fgmasdf IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev