after more testing yesterday I can describe more precisely:

I send an image from pix_video to a rectangle and I use a gemwin with the same resolution.
pix_video = 1280*720
gemwin = 1280*720
I use facetime (builtin), external webcam (logitech) and blackmagic intensity interface (USB3/HDMI)
I get a proper image and I can switch the cams. THAT’S GREAT !!!! :)

but
- when I change the resolution of pix_video I have to recreate gemwin to see the effect
- when I send create, 1 to gemwin I get the bogus errors and I have to wait for them popping up (more for facetime, less for external cams)
- real issue: the border 0 message to gemwin creates a black gap where the border was and changes the image frame (part of the image at the left side vanishes by an x-zoom, the window-size remains the same)
- the rectangle object needs weird numbers like 7.5 and 4 to get the image fitting to a gemwin, the original image is very small in the gemwin without scaling and adapting

I found the help-file for pix_video in the Max folder. But when I open it in the patch it is blank.

best
Michael



Am 25.03.2020 um 12:00 schrieb gem-dev-request@lists.iem.at:

Send GEM-dev mailing list submissions to
gem-dev@lists.iem.at

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gem-dev-request@lists.iem.at

You can reach the person managing the list at
gem-dev-owner@lists.iem.at

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of GEM-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image (Michael Beil)
  2. Re: GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image
     (IOhannes m zmölnig)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:22:41 +0100
From: Michael Beil <post@michaelbeil.de>
To: gem-dev@lists.iem.at
Subject: [GEM-dev] GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image
Message-ID: <343AD94E-91B3-4693-87E3-A6E1F0B65872@michaelbeil.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi list,

I try to use a patch that worked with 0.43.4 with 0.5/Gem0.94 on a Mac.
There are a some strange things I could not figure out yet. At first, each time I create a gem-window I get a dozen of

GEM: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image

errors.

Even when I just use the help-patch for pix_video (e.g.) I get them. All other problems are maybe also related to pix_video. Especially wrong resolutions and image-distortion. So my second question is: Has pix_video been replaced? Or discontinued? Is the pix_video-help still „valid“?

Maybe this has been discussed already, sorry then :)

Thanks and best
Michael







------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:01:36 +0100
From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>
To: gem-dev@lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to
copy2Image
Message-ID: <6978e076-d568-7c68-6c22-1934301dc8b9@iem.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On 3/24/20 2:22 PM, Michael Beil wrote:
Even when I just use the help-patch for pix_video (e.g.) I get them. All other problems are maybe also related to pix_video. Especially wrong resolutions and image-distortion. So my second question is: Has pix_video been replaced? Or discontinued? Is the pix_video-help still „valid“?

just a quick reply: [pix_video] is fine (well: should be :-))
the help-patch is also still valid.

what do you mean with  "wrong resolutions" and "image distortion"?

which camera are you using?



gfmards
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20200324/a23c4902/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev


------------------------------

End of GEM-dev Digest, Vol 141, Issue 1
***************************************