On 3/2/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">B. Bogart</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:ben@ekran.org">ben@ekran.org</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I did try reloading the files once I get to this weird state, but it<br>makes not difference, still behaves the same.</blockquote><div><br>
I defintely have not seen that. Can you post the patch or a stripped
down version that gives you this problem?&nbsp; I can try to mock
something up here.<br>
&nbsp;</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I'll try the RAM message, the videos are 2.5GB in total...</blockquote><div><br>

You will need 2.5 GB of RAM to load those.&nbsp; The QT call loads the
compressed movie into RAM and decompresses from memory.&nbsp; It is
quite efficient once loaded.<br>
&nbsp;</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">is &quot;ram&quot; only in the CVS version or was it also in 0.90? I don't<br>remember seeing that message in the help. I guess I'll try to compile a
<br>Gem on that g5 machine. (Jamie, does the cmd line build automatically<br>optimize for g5 when its on a g5?)</blockquote><div><br>
Any CPU option you use will not affect Quicktime performance at
all.&nbsp; Maybe you have old or wrong versions of the QT stuff in your
build?&nbsp; Can you test just the 16 files playing back in 0.90?<br>
</div><br></div><br>