I know, but this gem2pdp version works only with Gem 0.92.x not with 0.93.x, which means that Gem can not render non-english letters with the text objects.
gem2pdp should be included in Pd-extended 0.43.4, you shouldn't need to
install it separately.
.hc
On 02/11/2013 11:37 AM, Elektro Moon wrote:
> Iohannes,
>
> strange things are happening. I reinstalled pd-extended 0.43.4 on my
> Ubuntu. I achieved the polish letters with arialunicode fonts. Than I
> reinstalled gem2pdp which required Gem 0.92.3 from the repository.
> So gem2pdp worked but not the polish letters.
> Uninstalling gem2pdp and adding the path to Gem 93.4 from git-hub caused
> again the GL: invalid enumerate in pd.
> I know that there are fixes to gem2pdp but I never managed to compile from
> source. Anytime I add the folders where pd.pd_linux, gem.pd_linux and
> pdp.pd_linux exists, the compilation is stopped with the result of missing
> Pd and Gem sources.
> Which are the right folders for this?
> Or how can I find Gem 0.93.x with the right gem2pdp in repository? As this
> would be the most convenient.
>
> Thanks again for your helps. Tomorrow I send you the config.log file after
> the bad compilation with the filmMPEG1 problem.
>
> Have a nice evening:
>
> Popesz
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:21 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>wrote:
>
> On 2013-02-11 01:27, Elektro Moon wrote:> 689772@bugs.debian.org
>>>> Jack,
>>>>
>>>> thanks a lot, i managed to compile Gem 0.93.0.
>
> cool, what did you do?
>
>>>>
>>>> Gents,
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, if i use gemwin, it prints GL: invalid enumerant.
>>>> Even
>
> how often?
> what is the _exact_ version of Gem you are using? (as it is printed on
> startup)
>
>>>> text3D does not render anything.
>
> i'm sure you have a font in the right place, do you?
>>>> I need pdp2gem be installed and use Gem 0.93 or higher, as 0.92.x
>>>> does not render polish special characters such as ????. When I have
>>>> 0.93.x the pdp2gem is not loading if I have 0.92.x polish letters
>>>> are not in Gemwin.
>
> you need a pdp2gem that has been compiled against Gem-0.93, rather
> than Gem-0.92.
>
>>>> A total devil's circle.
>
> no.
>
>