thanks for the feedback,concerning the plugins, they are waiting for me in Brussel, I'm on tour in FranceI'll be back shortly next week, maybe I'll manage some spare time (between 2 washing machines) to put them onand line :-)and concerning the tag, i've edited it and called it v0.94-test2it's marked as a pre-release in Github's release page, but the tag didn't reflect itshould I choose another name to reflect the windows specific pre-release ?and concerning the missing DLL, could I add them to the (pre)-release .zip ?does the license allow me to do that ?and what about static link ? particularly for ImageMagick which depends on 285 DLL...is it a good idea ? even if the binary size is hugely increased ?+a
2014-09-19 21:11 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>:On 09/12/2014 01:56 PM, Antoine Villeret wrote:
>
> For now, I've put the Gem.dll on [2].
> Feel free to try it !_______________________________________________
> [2] : https://github.com/avilleret/Gem/releases/tag/0.94-win32
thanks a lot.
i had no problems with the dll (that is: no runtime msvcrt.dll was missing).
i only miss the plugins :-)
oh, and would you mind tagging the release as a test-release (instead of
0.94-win32, which sounds like everything's already working).
i'm a bit worried about accidentally pushing (to my repos) the tags i
pulled from your fork.
gfadsr
IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@lists.iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev