Sounds good to me.
.hc
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hi all
while initiating a cleanup of the pure-data project, i had a look at pd-gem as well.
of 12 registered developers, a total of 7 devs have committed at least once since 2006-10-10. 6 devs have not contributed to the repository since then. (one of the devs has been taken off the list since then)
here's the list of inactive devs: bbogart, dheck, doelie, ggeiger, timblech, tmusil
i will send an email asking them to opt out of a removal from the pd-gem sf-project.
below is the text (slightly modified version of the text i want to use for the pure-data project)
fmgasd IOhannes
-- Hi,
you are a registered developer at the "pd-gem" sourceforge project, which means that you have write access to the repository hosted there.
our project currently has 12 registered developers, some of them being inactive. as the administrator of the project, i would like to reduce the number of developers to the active ones.
since you haven't committed anything within the last two (2) years, you are considered to be "inactive", and therefore i would like to remove you from the list of developers.
if you ever feel like you need developer status (=write access to the repository) again, just send an email to the pd-dev mailinglist. (this is the main reason why i dare to send out this email: getting write access is so simple that people don't lose a privilige if they are removed from the list of developers)
if you feel that this is totally unjustified, please tell me within the next week and i will not remove you from the list of active-developers
mfg.asdr IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
zen \ \ \[D[D[D[D