On 8/18/06, Frank Barknecht <fbar@footils.org > wrote:

Hallo,
chris clepper hat gesagt: // chris clepper wrote:

> pix_snap2tex should not impose much of a performance hit unless the window
> resolution is really huge (2048x1536 or larger).  If it does then it has
> probably fallen back to software to do a pixel format conversion or there is
> some other hardware incompatibility.

Is there some way to debug this a bit deeper if performance losses are
happening? As I wrote I have two machines where performance of
pix_snap2tex is a problem on both. Maybe I just miss a bit of tuning
on my system. But at least the Intel chip is becoming more popular
with the new Intel-Macs, so maybe other people run into similar
problems as well.  (Though I'm running Linux, not OS-X ...)

Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__

_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev