2013/3/19 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-03-19 16:06, Antoine Villeret wrote:
> this is in my github repos in the branch pix_share_write :
> https://github.com/avilleret/Gem/tree/pix_share_write

hehe, i have incorporated your changes about 7 hours ago :-)

thanks for that 

>
> I don't know if it's a good idea but it seems to work for me

generally, i find it always pleasing, if an error is not (only)
printed to the pd-console but you get some message back into the
patch, so you can react on the error programmatically.

> I'm wondering if it could be good to have a dictionary instead of a
> hash table : when we use [set id sizex sizey pixel_format( message,
> pix_share* could try to find the id in the dictionary if there is
> no entry with that id, it generates a random shmem id, verify that
> nobody else is using it and tries to allocated data if it fails it
> could generates another id until it succeed and store the id in the
> dictionary
>
> pix_share_read will know the dictionary and can find the right
> shmem id

how is that supposed to work in two separate instances of Pd?

obviously, i forgot that whereas I'm sending id though OSC to other instance...
and I see no other ways than sending the id on localhost...

sorry for this stupid mistake

cheers


fgamsdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlFIiw8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQxGgCePjlJJTseMuPVMhuYQGWkavgv
u10AoMhpJaE6OsdPQk7HbhmMM0W75aTo
=5+nU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev