15 Sep
2008
15 Sep
'08
2:35 p.m.
cyrille henry wrote:
hello, thanks for the answer,
that would be great i think, but is this a plan or a work in progress?
well, the patch i sent should actually work (with a recent Gem that already has [gemreceive]), so it is already "work in progress".
the things that have to go away are: - the use of [gemhead] within [gemfbhead] ([gemhead] should be an abstraction with a [gemreceive] and some "gemreset" object(s)) - a [gemwin] abstraction should do the [send] and setup the viewpoint and the like (rather than code hidden within GemMan)
is it part of the multiple windows branch that is in development since many years now?
it is related to that. though the "is in development" hurts a bit :-)
fgnmasdr IOhannes